Papers
Alterdisciplinarity
Published in 'Culture, Theory and Critique', 2008.
- 223 Views
Between Responsibility and Irresponsibility: Cultural Studies and the Price of Fish
Published in Strategies, 2002
- 1 Citation
- 108 Views
Zizek's Interrogating the Real
Book Review, published in 'Culture Machine', 2006
Enter the Zizekian: Bruce Lee, Ideology and the Problem of Knowledge
Published in 'Entertext', 2006.
- 32 Views
The Task of the Transgressor
Published in 'Culture Machine', 2004
Politics and Ethics from Behind
Published in 'Culture Machine', 2002.
Alarming and Calming, Sacred and Accursed: The Proper Impropriety of Cultural Studies
Published in 'Cultural Studies: Interdisciplinarity and Translation' (2002)
- 4 Views
Ernesto Laclau, Chantal Mouffe and Post-Marxism
First published in The Edinburgh Encyclopaedia of Modern Criticism and Theory (2002)
McDeconstruction
Draft. Became a chapter in 'Deconstructing Popular Culture' (Palgrave 2008)
- 14 Views
Deconstruction is a Martial Art
Written for the book: Enduring Resistance: Cultural Theory after Derrida / La Résistance persévère: la théorie de la culture (d’)après Derrida (Langages / langues : English and French), Rodopi 2009
- 30 Views
Aberrant Pedagogies: JR, QT and Bruce Lee
This is a first draft. It is intended for submission to a special issue of 'Borderlands' on Ranciere and Queer Theory.
This is a first draft. It is intended for submission to a special issue of 'Borderlands' on Ranciere and Queer Theory.
- 26 Views
Enter The Zizekian: Bruce Lee, Cultural Studies, and the Problem of Knowledge
Published in "EnterText", 2006
- 17 Views
Marxism(s) and Postmarxism(s), 2001
Published in 'The Year's Work in Critical and Cultural Theory', OUP, 2002.
- 15 Views
Marxism(s) and Postmarxism(s), 2002
Published in 'The Year's Work in Critical and Cultural Theory', OUP, 2003
- 6 Views
Marxism(s) and Postmarxism(s), 2003
Published in 'The Year's Work in Critical and Cultural Theory', 2004
- 14 Views
The Other Cultural Revolution: Kung Fu and the Transformation of Global Popular Culture
Published in SL Magazine, 2009
This is just a magazine article.
- 26 Views
Interrogating Cultural Studies
Editor's Introduction to INTERROGATING CULTURAL STUDIES (London: Pluto, 2003)
INTERROGATING CULTURAL STUDIES
Contents
Acknowledgements
Contributors
Introduction: Interrogating Cultural Studies
Section One: From Cultural Studies
Catherine Belsey: From Cultural Studies to Cultural Criticism?
Mieke Bal: From Cultural Studies to Cultural Analysis: ‘a controlled reflection on the formation of method’
Martin McQuillan: The Projection of Cultural Studies
Section Two: Cultural Studies (&) Philosophy
Simon Critchley: Why I Love Cultural Studies
Chris Norris: Two Cheers for Cultural Studies: A Philosopher’s View
Section Three: For Cultural Studies
Adrian Rifkin: Inventing Recollection
Griselda Pollock: Becoming Cultural Studies: the Daydream of the Political
Section Four: What Cultural Studies
Jeremy Gilbert: Friends and Enemies: Which Side is Cultural Studies On?
Julian Wolfreys: …as if such a thing existed…
Section Five: Positioning Cultural Studies
John Mowitt: Cultural Studies, in Theory
Jeremy Valentine: The Subject Position of Cultural Studies: Is There A Problem?
Steven Connor: What Can Cultural Studies Do?
Section Six: Against Cultural Studies
Thomas Docherty: responses
Lynette Hunter: unruly fugues
Index
- 10 Views
Preface: Post-Marxism Versus Cultural Studies: Preface
'Preface', POST-MARXISM VERSUS CULTURAL STUDIES (Edinburgh University Press, 2007)
- 10 Views
Deconstructing "the Popular"
A sample chapter from DECONSTRUCTING POPULAR CULTURE (Palgrave, 2008)
“Deconstructing Popular Culture is an accessible, funny and stimulating introduction to popular culture. This is a book with both a passionate argument and a rare skill in making the ‘fine print’ of complex theoretical arguments accessible.”
- Richard Stamp, Senior Lecturer of Media and Cultural Studies, Bath Spa University
“Bowman writes very much as though he is speaking directly to a group of undergraduates: it engages them where they live. This book is an extraordinarily significant achievement.” –
-John Mowitt, Professor of Cultural Studies, University of Minnesota
Popular culture permeates every aspect of our lives: from the music we listen to, the films and television shows we watch and the books we read. But who decides what counts as popular culture? Why is it so important? And how do we go about studying it?
This book provides a unique introduction to popular culture. Unpicking and analysing recognisable examples from contemporary music, Hollywood film and the self-help movement, Paul Bowman uses techniques of deconstruction that encourage readers to form their own interpretations of the culture they experience every day. Introducing complex ideas effortlessly, the book shows how to avoid common pitfalls in studying theory, questions claims behind the importance of popular culture and looks at the problems and possibilities of studying this fast-changing field. With an innovative user guide and glossary to explain essential terms and ideas, this book makes difficult concepts relevant, accessible and interesting.
This witty, thought-provoking and insightful book provides a unique approach and a clear introduction to popular culture for all students of cultural studies, media studies and sociology.
(The publisher has put a sample chapter of the book here: http://www.palgrave.com/PDFs/0230545351.Pdf )
- 14 Views
Interview with Simon Critchley
Published in INTERROGATING CULTURAL STUDIES (2003)
- 38 Views
Interview with Chris Norris
Published in INTERROGATING CULTURAL STUDIES (2003)
- 20 Views
Deconstructing Pragmatism
published in parallax (1998)
- 11 Views
God's Gym
Published in parallax (1997)
- 14 Views
This Disagreement is not one: Laclau, Ranciere, Arditi
Published in Social Semiotics (2007)
- 219 Views
The Globalization of Martial Arts
Published in 'Martial Arts in the Modern World, 2nd Edition', 2010.
- 166 Views
Cultural Studies and Slavoj Žižek
First published in 'New Cultural Studies: Adventures in Theory' (Edinburgh UP, 2006)
This work explores the fraught relationship between Slavoj Žižek and cultural studies. It argues that although there is a growing and increasingly distinct disavowal of cultural studies in Žižek’s work, an examination of the reasons for, and the form and content of this disavowal actually amounts to something of a ‘royal road’ for understanding Žižek’s intellectual and political project. In short, it argues that in Žižek’s critique of cultural studies is the key to understanding his entire oeuvre. This is because Žižek construes cultural studies as an exemplary site of intellectual, political and ideological struggle: on the one hand, he argues, the insights of its ‘postmodernist deconstructionism’ challenge the ‘naïve cognitivism’ that is the dominant form of knowledge today; but, on the other hand, its trite multiculturalism and easy relativism amount to intellectual and political derelictions of responsibility. Against this, Žižek argues for a ‘politics of truth’ that remains focused on the power and effects of the capitalist economy. However, this paper argues, despite the importance of Žižek’s critique, his polemical zeal leads both his political and his intellectual project into a series of cul-de-sacs. It argues that in order to move his projects forward, Žižek must now reorient his stance vis-à-vis cultural studies, by more adequately acknowledging the importance of the Gramscian post-Marxist premise of cultural studies – that of the political propensities of the (university) institution – rather than living in the repetition of merely denouncing cultural studies as ‘ideological’. The paper argues that Žižek’s critique of cultural studies is indeed potentially greater than the sum of its parts, in that it casts important light on issues of culture, politics and ideology, and showing that cultural studies is in fact ambivalently central to his entire project; but it concludes that cultural studies’ institutional focus reciprocally problematizes – and points to the way forward for – Žižek’s intellectual and political paradigm.
- 80 Views
The Tao of Zizek
First published in 'The Truth of Zizek' (Continuum, 2007)
- 114 Views
The Margins of Philosophy; the Foundations of Cultural Studies
Review of Oliver Marchart, post-Foundational Political Thought
- 38 Views
Interview with Griselda Pollock
Published in Interrogating Cultural Studies (2003)
- 14 Views
Interview with Catherine Belsey: From Cultural Studies to Cultural Criticism?
Published in 'Interrogating Cultural Studies' (2003)
- 30 Views
Interview with Mieke Bal: From Cultural Studies to Cultural Analysis
Published in 'Interrogating Cultural Studies' (2003)
- 11 Views
Interview with Jeremy Gilbert: Which Side is Cultural Studies On?
Published in 'Interrogating Cultural Studies' (2003)
- 15 Views
Interview with Thomas Docherty
First published in Interrogating Cultural Studies (2003)
- 21 Views
The Fantasy Corpus of Martial Arts
First published in EMBODIED KNOWLEDGE: TRADITIONAL ASIAN MARTIAL ARTS IN A TRANSNATIONAL WORLD (SUNY, 2010)
- 43 Views
Sick Man of Asia Crosses The River: Bruce Lee and Queer Cultural Translation
First Draft of a Chapter for a book on Queer Europe
Aberrant Pedagogies: JR, QT and Bruce Lee
Published in Borderlands 8:2, 2009
This article proposes that central to queer studies (and ‘radical,’ ‘politicized’ scholarship more widely) is a critique focused on the cultural power of institutions – pedagogical institutions in particular. It relates Jacques Rancière’s critique of such institutions to this wider ‘radical political’ impulse, and relates this impulse itself to 1960s counterculture. It asks why Rancière’s critique stops before his own historical moment, a moment that can be tied to the 1960s; and it attempts to establish the discursive status of Rancièrean and radical approaches such as queer theory by picking up where Rancière leaves off: the countercultural critique of pedagogical institutions, which spread through many realms of society, including martial arts. The key figure here is the anti-institutional and countercultural Bruce Lee. So, the article explores Bruce Lee’s iconoclastic, inter- and antidisciplinary approach to ‘learning’ in relation to Rancière’s queer pedagogy in order to deepen our thinking about an ‘emancipatory relation.’
- 8 Views




Like (2)

Add Comment